I' read the same about the speed also, but aparrently the new webORB
3.0 has been made all fancy pants fast. WebORB claims it is 300%
faster.....but I'm guessing that now it's as fast as AMFPHP.
Also the idea that a team of people are on it now. AMFPHP has been at
1.9 for something like a year? WHo knows if the guy who claimed to
have taken it over will actually do anything.
FOr starting out, I'd go with the one that seems to have a more likely
future.
Alan
On Jul 7, 2008, at 12:20 AM, dnk wrote:
Yeah it does look better to the new person. Apparently amfphp is
faster from what I have read on the net(but maybe this gap is
closing?) for larger data sets.
I have found I can get an AMFPHP result with less code (from the
tutorials I looked at).
But it is all preference. I don't use the code generators, so that
is not a large factor for me).
d
On 6-Jul-08, at 6:57 PM, Alan wrote:
Thanks, I've been tinkering around with AMFPHP all yesterday some
today. I've checking out WebORB since this afternon.
So far I prefer WebORB. Mostly cause I'm new and the documentation
is insanely better. Plus the service browser for WebORB is
tremendously better, I can manger my MySQL database, generate
code....and this is stuff I just got into in the last hour.
