Just as an adjunct to this, I used to use AMFPHP but have since moved to WebORB 3.0. This was due primarily to reliability.
If you install the AMF module for AMFPHP (AMFEXT http://www.teslacore.it/wiki/index.php?title=AMFEXT), then AMFPHP runs about ten times faster. WebORB 3.0 is now about as fast as AMFPHP WITHOUT this extension. If we could get WebORB to use this extension then we would have the best of everything. --- In [email protected], dnk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 6-Jul-08, at 9:30 PM, Alan wrote: > > > I' read the same about the speed also, but aparrently the new webORB > > 3.0 has been made all fancy pants fast. WebORB claims it is 300% > > faster.....but I'm guessing that now it's as fast as AMFPHP. > > > > > > Also the idea that a team of people are on it now. AMFPHP has been > > at 1.9 for something like a year? WHo knows if the guy who claimed > > to have taken it over will actually do anything. > > > > FOr starting out, I'd go with the one that seems to have a more > > likely future. > > > > Alan > > > Yeah this kind of debate has been going on for some time (speed). So > it depends which article you read (I read that weborb had moved much > closer, but had not yet surpassed it). So I really have no idea which > is correct. Wade (the gentleman who took it over) had been off the > radar for some time (I believe he is involved with the "Essential > Guide to Open Source Flash" book which is where he has been busy), but > I noticed he posted on his blog about amfphp recently. (http://www.wadearnold.com/blog/ > ). > > Again, all preference. > > d >
