Hi Alex, when I call the CairngormEvent the first time just like this:
new LoadTestEvent().dispatch(); the moduleReadyHandler - method will not be called. But when I call the LoadTestEvent a second time, once again, just like this: new LoadTestEvent().dispatch() the moduleReadyHandler - method will be successfully called. I believe that the two EventListeners: ModuleEvent.READY and ModuleEvent.ERROR are not registered correctly in the first place. But I don't understand why!? Maybe there is an issue related to the FrontController? Thank you, masu On 7/12/08, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not sure I see the event logic you're talking about. > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *Sebastian Mohr > *Sent:* Saturday, July 12, 2008 9:22 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Module hell... Flex 3 > > > > Hi there, > > I have the same problem as *dbronk *mentioned > (see below) in conjunction with Cairngorm 2.2.1. > > I always have to dispatch the LoadTestEvent > twice to make the LoadTestCommand calling > the moduleReadyHandler-method. here is the > code: > > package com.test > { > import com.adobe.cairngorm.commands.ICommand; > import com.adobe.cairngorm.control.CairngormEvent; > > import flash.system.ApplicationDomain; > > import mx.events.ModuleEvent; > import mx.modules.IModuleInfo; > import mx.modules.ModuleManager; > > public class LoadTestCommand implements ICommand > { > private var moduleInfo:IModuleInfo; > > public function LoadTestCommand() > { > moduleInfo = ModuleManager.getModule('TestModule.swf'); > moduleInfo.addEventListener(ModuleEvent.READY, > moduleReadyHandler); > moduleInfo.addEventListener(ModuleEvent.ERROR, > moduleErrorHandler); > } > > public function execute(event:CairngormEvent):void > { > moduleInfo.load(ApplicationDomain.currentDomain); > } > > public function moduleReadyHandler(e:ModuleEvent) : void > { > trace('SUCCESS'); > } > > public function moduleErrorHandler(e:ModuleEvent) : void > { > trace('ERROR'); > } > } > } > > Is there a solution to dispatch the event only once > to make the Command loading the module? > > Thank you, > masu > > > On 1/28/08, *dbronk* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm trying to get something very basic to work with modules. I have > my app and two swf modules (Form1.swf and Form2.swf). Each test > module simply has a couple TextInput fields. I have also extended > Module so I can follow what is going on and I will be adding custom > code later. MyModule extends Module has: > > public function MyModule() { > super(); > trace("Module constructor"); > addEventListener(FlexEvent.INITIALIZE, onInitialize); > } > > protected function onInitialize(event:Event) : void { > trace("Module.onInit: " + this.toString()); > dispatchEvent(new BaseEvent("moduleLoaded", this, true, true)); > } > > Very basic. I want to be notified when the Module is initialized. > > When I have the following code inline to a button click which will > load the module it works fine > > var moduleLoader : ModuleLoader = new ModuleLoader(); > moduleLoader.id = moduleName; > moduleLoader.url = moduleName; > moduleLoader.loadModule(); > moduleLoader.addEventListener("moduleLoaded", onModuleLoaded); > moduleStackChild = moduleLoader; > moduleStack.addChild(moduleStackChild); > moduleMap.put(moduleName, moduleStackChild); > > My onModuleLoaded function gets called. > > Now for the issue. If I take this code and place it into a common > object it no longer works THE FIRST TIME. I have two buttons, one to > load Form1.swf and the other to load Form2.swf. When this code to > load the module is in a separate class, it doesn't matter if I click > button 1 or 2 first. It simply will not work on the first click. > Second click and beyond work fine. Also, in debug mode, works great > every time. What happens is that the last thing that runs is the > loadModule() command. The constructor on MyModule never executes on > the first execution. Future executions work fine. > > I'm hoping I explained this good enough as it is very strange. But I > definitely want to have this function in my util classes and not have > to duplicate the code all over the place. > > Suggestions? > > Thanks, > Dale > > > >
