Yeah, I only use it as a relative number.
________________________________ From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Van Horn Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 2:09 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] link report question Thanks Alex...so it doesnt really mean a whole lot, in regard to the actual swf...but could be used as a relative comparison to the other classes. On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: I don't know what they fully mean given that classes share constant pools, but there is an optimization pass where some byte code is pulled from swf, but then the SWF is compressed so it will always be smaller than the sum of sizes. ________________________________ From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of John Van Horn Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:47 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> Subject: [flexcoders] link report question Can someone explain where exactly the "size" and "optimizedsize" attributes for a script in a link report come from? The sum of optimizedsize for all nodes in a link report always seems to be way more than the file size of the swf. -- John Van Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- John Van Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
