Swfdump -showoffset, but the offsets are still the uncompressed offset

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Toby Ashley
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 3:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] link report question

 

While we're on the subject, does anyone know if it's possible to somehow
generate a report which also includes the size of any embedded assets /
fonts / whatever? Something along the lines of the "generate size
report" option in the Publish Settings of the Flash IDE?




On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:

Yeah, I only use it as a relative number.

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ]
On Behalf Of John Van Horn
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 2:09 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] link report question

 

Thanks Alex...so it doesnt really mean a whole lot, in regard to the
actual swf...but could be used as a relative comparison to the other
classes.

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:

I don't know what they fully mean given that classes share constant
pools, but there is an optimization pass where some byte code is pulled
from swf, but then the SWF is compressed so it will always be smaller
than the sum of sizes.

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ]
On Behalf Of John Van Horn
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:47 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: [flexcoders] link report question

 

Can someone explain where exactly the "size" and "optimizedsize"
attributes for a script in a link report come from? The sum of
optimizedsize for all nodes in a link report always seems to be way more
than the file size of the swf.

-- 
John Van Horn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 




-- 
John Van Horn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

 

 

Reply via email to