Thanks guys, You've been a big help, and confirmed what i thought was probabley the case.
Matt --- In [email protected], "Andrew Trice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You *could*, but it wouldn't really fit with the cairngorm architecture. > I'd recommend just creating common views/commands for login > functionality, and just reusing those per project. You could create a > base project that you use as a template for future projects that > includes a basic setup of caringorm and any common elements (such as a > login). > > > > -Andy > > > > _____________________________________ > > Andrew Trice > > Cynergy Systems, Inc. > > http://www.cynergysystems.com > > > > Blog: http://www.cynergysystems.com/blogs/page/andrewtrice > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Office: 866-CYNERGY > > > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of matthew_brailsford > Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 7:44 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [flexcomponents] Re: Cairngorm Components? > > > > So you wouldn't be able to encapsulate the business/command side of > things? > > --- In [email protected] > <mailto:flexcomponents%40yahoogroups.com> , "Stefan Schmalhaus" > <stefan@> wrote: > > > > > We create many different solutions, all of which will have a log > in, > > > so how would you encapsulate the login functionality so that you > > > could just re-use it per project? > > > > As far as I understand the Cairngorm concept, a "login component" > > could only be a view (based on a Panel with username/password text > > fields, a login button etc.) that can be used in a ViewStack, for > > example. > > > > Stefan > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcomponents/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
