Re: [flexcomponents] Re: Cairngorm Components?

Fri, 28 Jul 2006 06:11:59 -0700

Not having anything to do with caringorm;

I think some type of login encapsulation would be considered an application component.or a component of an application.

I think you will see some interesting things start to become encapsulated in the future. The word 'Application' is just to broad and could be thrown at anything that didn't define some lowlevel encapsulation.

In my opinion, component means a design pattern and specific mind set you take when you are defining micro pieces of a system in realtion to a macro system that could be part of an even larger system.

philosophy then kicks in, what are words anyway, components to me are more 'the act of closing sub systems'.

Peace, Mike

On 7/28/06, matthew_brailsford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Thanks guys,

You've been a big help, and confirmed what i thought was probabley
the case.

Matt

--- In [email protected], "Andrew Trice"


<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You *could*, but it wouldn't really fit with the cairngorm
architecture.
> I'd recommend just creating common views/commands for login
> functionality, and just reusing those per project. You could
create a
> base project that you use as a template for future projects that
> includes a basic setup of caringorm and any common elements (such
as a
> login).
>
>
>
> -Andy
>
>
>
> _____________________________________
>
> Andrew Trice
>
> Cynergy Systems, Inc.
>
> http://www.cynergysystems.com
>
>
>
> Blog: http://www.cynergysystems.com/blogs/page/andrewtrice
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>
> Office: 866-CYNERGY
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
matthew_brailsford
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 7:44 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [flexcomponents] Re: Cairngorm Components?
>
>
>
> So you wouldn't be able to encapsulate the business/command side
of
> things?
>
> --- In [email protected]
> <mailto:flexcomponents%40yahoogroup s.com> , "Stefan Schmalhaus"

> <stefan@> wrote:
> >
> > > We create many different solutions, all of which will have a
log
> in,
> > > so how would you encapsulate the login functionality so that
you
> > > could just re-use it per project?
> >
> > As far as I understand the Cairngorm concept, a "login component"
> > could only be a view (based on a Panel with username/password
text
> > fields, a login button etc.) that can be used in a ViewStack, for
> > example.
> >
> > Stefan
> >
>




--
What goes up, does come down. __._,_.___


SPONSORED LINKS
Custom software development Database development software Embedded software development
Offshore software development Software development

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



__,_._,___

Reply via email to