Michael Schmalle wrote:
Hey man,
The tone in your reply is far from nice. Maybe it's a translation thing.
I was speaking from the history here, most posts could be answered on
flexcoders.
Matt is obviously asking for a reason that he probably has not divulged.
Thanks for mentioning my name twice as well.
I put a lot of effort into this list, trying to get more developers interested in the mechanics of the framework (that was what this list was created for).
But it really had turned into an "an advanced flexcoders" as you put it with a
great deal of spam.
Andriy, I think you really took my post out of context.
I think that if you re-read the post, Andriy was thanking you not
criticising you and paying a compliment to the list. Yes, my first
language is English and I fail to see any derogatory tone.
Paul
Mike
--- In [email protected], Andriy Panas <a.pa...@...> wrote:
Hi all,
I am sorry to hear that Michael Schmalle got tired of moderating
this list and wasting quite a considerable ammout of time deleting
useless and inappropriate topics from this list.
Thankfully to Michael Schmalle efforts, I always treated
"flexcomponents" to be superior to "flexcoders" list, think of
"advanced_flexcoders" mailing list.
While we have only 3152 members onboard, the presence of
professionals who were and are involved in creation of Flex SDK 2 & 3
(namely Alex Harui, Gordon Smith, Manish Jetani) is a real gem to any
remaining member of this group.
I must admit, I am slowly drifting towards Adobe Forums lately, I
very satisfied by the outcome of my 2 recent conversations in "LCDS 3
Beta" forum branch, but until Flex SDK engineers are answering some
topics in "flexcomponents" list, I will remain present here as well.
--
Best regards,
Andriy Panas
------------------------------------
