Hi ..

I have a suggestion, y dont we make it only components centric forum ..
 - where each member can share idea related to new component crated by them
 - new members can display their component related R n d r can can ask
doubts
 - many others

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Michael Schmalle
<[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
> Hey man,
>
> The tone in your reply is far from nice. Maybe it's a translation thing.
>
> I was speaking from the history here, most posts could be answered on
> flexcoders.
>
> Matt is obviously asking for a reason that he probably has not divulged.
>
> Thanks for mentioning my name twice as well.
>
> I put a lot of effort into this list, trying to get more developers
> interested in the mechanics of the framework (that was what this list was
> created for).
>
> But it really had turned into an "an advanced flexcoders" as you put it
> with a great deal of spam.
>
> Andriy, I think you really took my post out of context.
>
> Mike
>
>
> --- In [email protected] <flexcomponents%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Andriy Panas <a.pa...@...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am sorry to hear that Michael Schmalle got tired of moderating
> > this list and wasting quite a considerable ammout of time deleting
> > useless and inappropriate topics from this list.
> >
> > Thankfully to Michael Schmalle efforts, I always treated
> > "flexcomponents" to be superior to "flexcoders" list, think of
> > "advanced_flexcoders" mailing list.
> >
> > While we have only 3152 members onboard, the presence of
> > professionals who were and are involved in creation of Flex SDK 2 & 3
> > (namely Alex Harui, Gordon Smith, Manish Jetani) is a real gem to any
> > remaining member of this group.
> >
> > I must admit, I am slowly drifting towards Adobe Forums lately, I
> > very satisfied by the outcome of my 2 recent conversations in "LCDS 3
> > Beta" forum branch, but until Flex SDK engineers are answering some
> > topics in "flexcomponents" list, I will remain present here as well.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Andriy Panas
> >
>
>  
>

Reply via email to