I'd love to chuck VAC right out of the picture entirely for digital
modes too. I/Q would be swimmingly fine.

On 11/15/2010 03:27 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
> I want a software based TNC that is *not* AWGPE.  I want it to be open 
> source.  And best of all, I want it to be conversant in I/Q in addition to AF 
> so that I can feed it and receive complex data in the digital domain.  I want 
> it and my SDR software to talk the same language without the need of an 
> interpreter or a virtual Rosetta Stone.
>
> The best of both worlds would be a modular program where the foundation layer 
> was I/Q based and abstracted from the service layer so you could plug 
> different modem modules into it to do digital modes and one of them would be 
> an APRS enabled packet modem.
>
> (YES.  I am frustrated getting a VHF/UHF SDR operational on packet and having 
> to resort to surgically attaching a hardware TNC to my SOFTware defined 
> radio.  I have "Borged up" my beautiful SDR and none too happy about it.)
>
> -Tim
> -----
> W4TME
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flexedge mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz
> This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge.  It is used 
> for posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist 
> who are using beta versions of the software.
>
>   

-- 
 Sent from my Linux box.
 Regards de KC6KGE.
  A very happy Flex-3000 user.
  Skype flamebait
  Gmail flamebait at gmail dot com


_______________________________________________
Flexedge mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz
This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge.  It is used for 
posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist who are 
using beta versions of the software.

Reply via email to