Thanks - it is indeed very gratifying!
But credit has to go to John Davidson, who did some very important
page-level optimizations on top of the core engine stuff.
Also, it's still slower than FlexWiki 1.8. J
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jimmy
Sieben
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 5:18 PM
To: FlexWiki Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Flexwiki-users] FlexWiki 2.0 Progress Report
That is very encouraging news, that a feature like caching could be added as
an orthogonal change.
Nice work.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig
Andera
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 4:03 PM
To: 'FlexWiki Users Mailing List'
Subject: [Flexwiki-users] FlexWiki 2.0 Progress Report
Oh wow - I'm rerunning the test now, and the numbers are coming in somewhere
in the 500-1000ms range. Still slower than FW 1.8, but much, much faster
than it was without caching. The test will take a few hours to wind down -
I'll post results tomorrow. The best part is, the caching provider is
actually only about 80 lines of code right now.
It'll be interesting to see where the next bottleneck is.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Flexwiki-users mailing list
Flexwiki-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexwiki-users
