OK, so I've got the ParserExpressionReaderTests going.. in both cases, I made the ever-so-clever assumption that Vladimir was all about TDD and I made the code match the tests... This actually seems to be born out by the direction his changes where going based on diffs between the two sets of code.
The GrammarTests seem to be more problematic, though. There's only one test case and the two Grammar.xml files that are in SVN are vastly different, (and the test case is yet another variety,) so we've really got nothing to go on until/unless we can hear back. I tried putting together a method that would really read the grammar in, but it's kinda hopeless unless we can figure out which one he wants or, I suppose, which one we like better... As to the embedded XML files for the tests themselves, I'm sure you'll agree that it'd be easy enough to change this to just read a file from disk and not mess with the recompile step. Anyway, I guess I'll pause and give Craig and chance to ping Vladimir. I can plug away, but with the tests and code kinda at odds, I'd rather know which was in better shape before plunging in any further.... -nathan On 8/14/07, Nathan Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Microsoft. And of course we understand that people get busy. But maybe I can > > give him a call and see if he can commit whatever work he has done. > > > > > This would be good. Basically, I think that what he sent me last was > in an state of flux... not only from the standpoint of his thoughts, > but the code as well... > > I'm basically at the state that Derek is in... I understand what is > failing and maybe even why based on diffs. (e.g. the MatchSetTest > looks like he changed the name of MatchSet to CharSetName between apr > and sept.) the other ParserExpRdr test that is failing is a bit > harder. It looks to me like he may have been changing the "AnyChar" > rule "MatchAny"... He changed some other rule names similarly.... Or > I'm completely wrong. Simple, right? > > In any case, any input/code from Vladimir would be muchly appreciated. > If not, then I suppose that we'll just roll up our sleeves. I plan on > keep looking at it today and I'll post back if I run into anything.... > > -nathan > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Flexwiki-users mailing list Flexwiki-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexwiki-users
