Thanks for this Nathan. I think we'd make more progress faster if Vladimir
could provide his latest code or at least some direction, but I'm willing to
help out if I can whatever happens.
Derek.
On 8/14/07, Nathan Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, so I've got the ParserExpressionReaderTests going.. in both cases,
> I made the ever-so-clever assumption that Vladimir was all about TDD
> and I made the code match the tests... This actually seems to be born
> out by the direction his changes where going based on diffs between
> the two sets of code.
>
> The GrammarTests seem to be more problematic, though. There's only one
> test case and the two Grammar.xml files that are in SVN are vastly
> different, (and the test case is yet another variety,) so we've really
> got nothing to go on until/unless we can hear back. I tried putting
> together a method that would really read the grammar in, but it's
> kinda hopeless unless we can figure out which one he wants or, I
> suppose, which one we like better...
>
> As to the embedded XML files for the tests themselves, I'm sure you'll
> agree that it'd be easy enough to change this to just read a file from
> disk and not mess with the recompile step.
>
> Anyway, I guess I'll pause and give Craig and chance to ping Vladimir.
> I can plug away, but with the tests and code kinda at odds, I'd rather
> know which was in better shape before plunging in any further....
>
> -nathan
>
> On 8/14/07, Nathan Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Microsoft. And of course we understand that people get busy. But maybe
> I can
> > > give him a call and see if he can commit whatever work he has done.
> > > >
> >
> > This would be good. Basically, I think that what he sent me last was
> > in an state of flux... not only from the standpoint of his thoughts,
> > but the code as well...
> >
> > I'm basically at the state that Derek is in... I understand what is
> > failing and maybe even why based on diffs. (e.g. the MatchSetTest
> > looks like he changed the name of MatchSet to CharSetName between apr
> > and sept.) the other ParserExpRdr test that is failing is a bit
> > harder. It looks to me like he may have been changing the "AnyChar"
> > rule "MatchAny"... He changed some other rule names similarly.... Or
> > I'm completely wrong. Simple, right?
> >
> > In any case, any input/code from Vladimir would be muchly appreciated.
> > If not, then I suppose that we'll just roll up our sleeves. I plan on
> > keep looking at it today and I'll post back if I run into anything....
> >
> > -nathan
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Flexwiki-users mailing list
> Flexwiki-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexwiki-users
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Flexwiki-users mailing list
Flexwiki-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexwiki-users
