> It sounds like you've already written this. If you have tests for it, I'd > say go ahead and commit it. >
OK, I'll look at doing it later today. > Also, assuming we make this change, is it fair to say that your current > analysis is that FW 2.0 is fast enough for you? There are still a bunch of > critical use cases I need to verify (David's mega-wiki among them), but > since you were one of the people who had specific criteria, I just want to > make sure that we've at least addressed your scenarios. > Your work alone gets me as fast as I was in 1.8, which is enough to make me and my users happy. Once I commit the stuff above, then my problem pages will actually be significantly faster in 2.0 than in 1.8 (again, the fastest optimization is not the doing work :) .) Derek, all this discussion has been in associated with the Bliki stuff, so I'll update the zip file on my site with the perf improvements once I get it all in line. And, again, the work that you did got it to where I needed it to be, so thanks a lot, Craig. -nathan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Flexwiki-users mailing list Flexwiki-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexwiki-users
