I'd really appreciate that the way things are setup at the moment. The
other alternative I'd be happy with would be to have the docs locked
down on the official site (in a separate namespace, perhaps).

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Nathan Jones
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 11:06 AM
To: FlexWiki Users Mailing List
Subject: [Flexwiki-users] Documentation idea

Hi, I just had an idea that I wanted to run by you guys.

I was browsing the infamous WikiNewsletter topic when it occurred to
me that all the documentation on flexwiki.com is in this same
precarious condition. It occurred to me that what we really needed was
a "shippable" copy of this that could be bundled up with the distro.
It could maybe replace one of the sample wiki namespaces.

I'm guessing that it would take a bit of time to gather up, but I know
that I sure would like to have local documentation that I can count on
to be accurate.

Some of this would lose value with the security in 2.0, but I for one
always appreciate local docs.

So what do you think? Is that something that you'd like to see bundled
with the FW distro? If so, I'll start working on getting it gathered
and checked in.

-nathan

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Flexwiki-users mailing list
Flexwiki-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexwiki-users

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Flexwiki-users mailing list
Flexwiki-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexwiki-users

Reply via email to