I have been working on the documentation going over what is in
FlexWiki and getting very familiar with the content. I have moved over
about 300 topics to my site and started cleanup. Surprisingly there is
not a lot required. The most difficult decisions are relevance of
history. I have got probably about 50% clean and need a second pass
through the rest. It looks like I need to move about 100 more topics
from FlexWiki so that the core support documentation is coherent. This
will probably be done by early next week. It could easily be moved
into its own namespace and some of the topics locked.
There would need to be a way to hold discussion on various topics, but
that could be managed by {topic includes} wheree the topic page being
discussed is referenced and the actual discussion is what is on the
page.
John Davidson
On 9/12/07, Craig Andera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this is a fantastic idea. Putting it in its own namespace and
> committing it along with the code is a great idea. As for what should be on
> flexwiki.com, obviously we want the docs for every version we release, each
> in its own namespace, all of them read-only.
>
> To be clear: the source of truth should be SVN, not www.flexwiki.com.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Flexwiki-users mailing list
Flexwiki-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexwiki-users
