Roberto Inzerillo wrote:
> As I see it, FGFS won't probably _need_ to take into account the elastic
> deformations of its structure in order to get a nice simulation ... but
> that's part of the visual simulation, a very interesting aspect of the
> visual realism of the simulator. I wonder what do pilots (those flying
> real) think about such a feature in FGFS?
I guess having an elastic wing on a 747 or, even better, on a B52 would
be a really impressinve feature. Glider pilots might be interested as
well, but we'd better have 'working' thermals for such a case.
With a simple SE Cessna or Piper the wing doesn't look very much
elastic. If the wing of our Cessna would start moving then I'd consider
myself to be in serious trouble ;-)
Regards,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
