At 10:49 PM 1/4/2002 -0600, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
>This assumes that MS is doing things correctly and/or the way things 
>should be done. This is an invalid assumption. This is one of the reasons 
>I, personally, wanted to begin writing an FDM.
>

A heavy assumption indeed. The MSFS flight model is crude at the logic 
level, and no amount of knob-twisting in the .air files can make it work right.

Uncoordinated flight is a good example. It seems to work like this: heading 
gets incremented based on a coordinated turn at the existing airspeed and 
bank angle. Then the rudder position is compared to a "correct" position, 
and the nose is yawed off the flight path by an angle proportional to the 
error. The "correct" position seems to be a pulse of size determined by the 
roll rate -- in other words, a canned sequence. Lateral lift component is 
not modeled -- i.e., no matter how much uncoordinated rudder is applied, 
the airplane continues along the flight path determined by the bank angle 
history. It is impossible to make a skidding turn (which includes fine 
heading adjustments with rudder on an ILS) or to do a slip. Applying rudder 
without aileron pressure will turn the airplane, but only because another 
canned sequence applies a bank input; this bank actually controls the turn.

Worse yet, as far as I can tell, variation of induced drag with angle of 
attack isn't modeled.

And the seaplane model is beyond belief. An airplane on the water sits in a 
fixed position and heading regardless of wind and power setting until the 
throttle setting exceeds a threshold; then it starts to accelerate. Only 
then can it be turned. In other words, all they did was to take the ground 
model and add a gentle bobbing motion in the vertical axis.

On the plus side, there are some lovely exterior graphics and some pretty 
good panels. But I don't think any part of the MSFS models could be used to 
determine flight performance of the aircraft.

rj



_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to