John Wojnaroski wrote:
 > Believe there was a discussion while back regards YASIM options, but
 > can't find it.
 >
 > Could someone tell me command line options for running YASIM with the
 > various models?

If you're just running it, then the aircraft files already take care
of everything for you.  Just use --aircraft=xxx-yasim (where xxx can
currently be c172, c310, dc3, a4, harrier, or 747).

The only command line argument that will affect the FDM as such is
overriding the /sim/fuel-fraction property.  The jets, especially,
have different performance with different fuel loads.  Just use:
--prop:/sim/fuel-fraction=0.2 (for example) to get a reasonable
"approach" configuration.

With the jets, you'll also want the HUD turned on as there aren't any
panels yet.  I use: --enable-hud and --disable-panel for these guys.

There's also a complication with the Harrier.  You'll need to map a
joystick axis to the /controls/thrust-vector[0] property in order to
work the thrust vectoring.  A keyboard interface would be possible
too, but due to the lack of a panel there's no feedback to the user
about what the setting is currently.  I use one of the rotary dials on
my Saitek X45 (OT note: a *GREAT* joystick, if anyone is interested in
recommendations) and it works great.

I've been playing/practicing with the Harrier a lot recently.  I
really should write up a "training guide" or somesuch, for folks just
getting into it.  The learning curve on the VTOL stuff is nasty and
steep, kind of like being a real life test pilot on the things.  Loads
of fun.  I can *almost* reliably land vertically now -- but hovering
still eludes me.  Once I move away from the location I picked to land
on, I have to fly off and re-do the whole approach.

Oh, and Gene: I've got an F-15C for you (attached) but I'm not
entirely satified with it.  What's happened is that the "parasite"
drag has to be pushed so low by the solver in order to match the mach
2.5 cruise number that the induced drag (that is, the backwards
component of the lift at non-zero AoA) ends up dominating.  The
aircraft bleeds speed *fast* in a turn, much faster than the A-4,
which has a broadly similar wing configuration and loading.  I'll need
to put in supersonic drag handling before this works really well.  But
it takes off, lands, and accelerates more or less like the real thing.

Andy

-- 
Andrew J. Ross                NextBus Information Systems
Senior Software Engineer      Emeryville, CA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]              http://www.nextbus.com
"Men go crazy in conflagrations.  They only get better one by one."
  - Sting (misquoted)


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to