"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

> Jim Wilson writes:
> 
> > If you set --altitude=1933 when starting at CL77 the mishap does not
> > occur.
> 
> JSBSim is getting fed a consistant starting ground elevation now with
> the latest CVS changes.

Yes I updated before replying, this works with the latest changes.  Try
setting --altitude=1933 (probably doesn't prove anything).  I noticed that
we're passing it 1924 (or at least thats what JSBsim is initializing at first
pass).

> > And I guess I'm wondering still if it is possible to set the plane
> > on that tile before reporting position to FDM's so that it still
> > works even if there is a data problem.
> 
> This is what we do.  The tile is loaded and a valid ground elevation
> is determined before the FDM init() routine is called.
> 

Ok sorry for the stupid q's :-)

> > This may or may not be related but when I start up at an airport for
> > which i have no scenery, the elevation is below 0.  At EHAM it is
> > -17 ft as shown in /position/altitude-ft.
> 
> Actually, when an ocean tile is automatically generated, we use really
> big triangles (i.e. two triangle to cover the whole tile.)  If the
> elevation is 0 at the corners, the surface of the tile forms a sort of
> 3d square 'secant' so the elevation within the ocean tile will be <
> 0.  -17 sounds reasonable for an interior position.
> 

Ah, ok ...makes sense.  Thanks for the explanation.

Best,

Jim


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to