Tony Peden writes: > What form would you need the surface positions in? Actual angles are > the easiest thing for JSBSim to output (would those be useful for 3D > models?), but I can see where normalized positions (-1..1) might be > easier to deal with.
I use angles (degrees) in the 3D models as well. Currently, I'm converting from the normalized positions, but actual angles would be great. Note that angles will have to be reported separated for each aileron, since the amount of travel up and down often differs. > > If the elevator angle is always reported relative to the incidence > > angle of the horizontal stabilizer, we should be OK. > > I think that in most cases this will not be true, elevator will usually > be reported relative to a body reference line. That's fine -- I can design markup to deal with that situation when the need arises. All the best, David -- David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
