On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 06:16, David Megginson wrote: > Tony Peden writes: > > > OK, after discovering that my original implementation was horribly > > buggy, I have now committed a better version of the normalized control > > surface position code to JSBSim and FG cvs. There is a new set of > > properties for these: > > > /surface-positions/flap-pos-pct > > /surface-positions/elevator-pos-pct > > /surface-positions/left-aileron-pos-pct > > /surface-positions/right-aileron-pos-pct > > /surface-positions/rudder-pos-pct > > Since Tony and Andy think there should be some kind of official > statement from me, I hereby bless these property names for > semi-official use until someone thinks of something better. Go forth > into the world and multiply, deus tecum, etc. > > Andy, I'd be grateful if you could set these properties as well, so > that I can switch over the animation files. > > Should we use a -pct suffix for all normalized values, i.e. > > /controls/elevator-pct > /controls/rudder-pct > > ? It would probably be more consistent, but some of these are > heavily-used properties.
I certainly like the idea of having some sort of units indicator on every property name, though I agree risk of breakage is high in this case. > > > All the best, > > > David > > -- > David Megginson > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel > -- Tony Peden [EMAIL PROTECTED] We all know Linux is great ... it does infinite loops in 5 seconds. -- attributed to Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
