David Megginson wrote: > Andy Ross writes: > > I agree in general. I'd suggest the use of -fraction or somesuch > > instead of -pct if the range is 0:1, as it is for most of these > > properties currently. > > An earlier suggestion was -n for "normalized", which is probably the > most accurate (and has the advantage of brevity). Is there any > standard unit abbreviation that conflicts with that and is useful for > flight simulation?
Forces in newtons, although the unit is capitalized in normal usage. While not a showstopper, if we do go to metric someone is going to get confused between "throttle-n" and "thrust-N". How about -u for unit length? Or the slightly more verbose -norm or -frac perhaps? I'm fine with whatever. Andy -- Andrew J. Ross NextBus Information Systems Senior Software Engineer Emeryville, CA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nextbus.com "Men go crazy in conflagrations. They only get better one by one." - Sting (misquoted) _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
