David Megginson wrote: > > Curtis L. Olson writes: > > > I'm just about to commit a massive series of changes that converts all > > the .xml files to more standard .ini files. Oh, shoot, I meant to > > save that announcement for 4/1/2002. :-) > > We have to coordinate better -- I'm just finishing switching them all > to TeX. FlightTeX will be a new executable that both flies a plane > and generates beautiful documentation simultaneously, but it will > require us all to learn Pascal.
Why? Didn't you know that TeX come with its own programming language? 256 variables should be enough (or was it even 8*256?) - we can use the harddisk if we need more. Or we could use Omikron, the 16 bit TeX version. Oh, and using TeX extensively will help us to find a bug and get lots of cash from Donald E. Knuth :) CU, Christian, who's working on an autopilot in ADA PS: Anyone who want�s to do the user interface in EMACS LISP? -- The idea is to die young as late as possible. -- Ashley Montague Whoever that is/was; (c) by Douglas Adams would have been better... _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
