> In ATC.cxx change:
>
> int FGATC::RemovePlane() {
> }
>
> to
>
> int FGATC::RemovePlane() {
> return 0;
> }
>
> to fix your compiler error.
>
> The problem in approach.cxx is the good old (for int i= ...
> business. Alexander - MSVC6 can't scope variable declarations
> within a for loop declaration properly so you need to do
> int i;
> for(i= ... {
> }
> for(i= ... {
> }
>
> instead of
>
> for(int i= ... {
> }
> for(int i= ... {
> }
>
> which works on conforming compilers.
>
Ok, sorry for this. I will try to remember it for the future. Is anybody
going to fix this in the CVS tree?
What do I have to do if I want the gcc compiler under Linux to return
an error if a routine of type non-void is defined but no value is
returned?
BTW, how is updating of the CVS tree handled for this project? I suppose
there is a limited number of people who are allowed to upload, who is it?
Cheers Alexander
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
