Bernie Bright wrote: > "Curtis L. Olson" wrote: > >>Bernie Bright writes: >> >>>Erik Hofman wrote: >>> >>>>What should we do about this? >>>> >>>>Erik >>>> >>>> >>>Seems to be boost related. What compiler and platform? I seem to >>>remember you are running an old IRIX system. Could you check >>>http://www.boost.org/status/compiler_status.html to see if your platform >>>is supported and if there are work arounds. If the worst happens we may >>>have to back out the recent boost additions. >>> >>Looks like the stock sgi compiler tanks on just about all the boost >>modules including bind and function. clib (whatever that is) and >>STLport seem to resolve the problem for these modules and most of the >>other ones. >> > > clib is new to me too, but I'm no irix expert. My guess is that it > provides <cstdlib> style headers which was reported as a problem by > Erik. STLport appears the way to go though.
While I agree that STLPort may be a good thing, I'm a bit worried about the fact that there are a *lot* of IRIX related fixes in the code, end we may need even more fixes to support STLPort (also). I'll take a look at both clib and STLport and see what might be best. Erik _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
