> This doesn't mean much to me but it may be of some use. I have a > feeling though that your compiler may be too old to compile boost. Is > gcc 2.95 an option?
Erik put _huge_ effort into the project because GCC is definitely _no_ option on IRIX/MIPS. I know what I'm talking about because I spent a bunch of hours to figure out how to generate reliable and perbformant binaries with GCC. It would be more than sad if FlightGear would loose a platform and contributors just for the sake of including another tool like boost. In the last days I've read several voices worrying about the inclusion of another external dependancy and it appears these voices were right :-(( Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
