On Saturday, April 6, 2002, at 08:09 PM, Tony Peden wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 17:53, Jonathan Polley wrote:
>>
>> p.s. Another odd thing happened. It seems that, in the latest update of
>> FGAerodynamics, when
>>
>> inline double GetForces(int n) const {return vForces(n);}
>>
>> was changed to
>>
>> double GetForces(int n) const {return vForces(n);}
>>
>> that MSVC no longer has a problem with the overloading of GetForces() (i.
>> e.
>> , I could abandon my local changes). Any ideas on that one?
>
> I don't know, but discussion here seems to indicate that specifying
> inline is pointless anyway since we take a pointer to it.
>
> So we'll take it!
I just tried removing the 'inline' from the front of the methods that MSVC
complains about and it appears that FGAerodynamics is the only place that
stopped complaining. Go figure.
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
