David Megginson writes: > We'd also need to >avoid letting any user-supplied models cancel ours out; >we could >either put the user's models in a separate subtree or start the >built-in ones at a high index (like 99999).
Setting up and walking a SceneGraph although relatively cheap is not a 'costless' operation. So I reccommend utilizing existing SSG 'trees' whenever possible. Also IMHO I don't see anything wrong with letting a user's Model cancel out ours, we aren't trying to be dictatorial or we wouldn't be going to pains to make the SIM configurable. the-customer-is-always-right'ly yrs :-) Norman _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
