On Tuesday 30 April 2002 7:33 pm, Jim Wilson wrote:
> David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > There are obviously some aerodynamic changes in the 172R as well as
> > the more obvious powerplant and panel changes.  Our JSBSim model uses
> > mostly the standard 172/182 coefficients that Roskam provides, but
> > these are probably wrong for the 172R.
> >
> > A while ago, Alex suggested that we would be better modelling the
> > 172M/N/P (I think), since those are more common.  In retrospect, I
> > agree, for a slightly different reason -- I don't think that we have
> > access to the right numbers for a 172R.
> >
> > What does everyone else think?  Would you all be happy to see the tach
> > calibrated to 2700 rather than 2400, and lose 100RPM when you switch
> > on carb heat?
>
> Makes sense to me.  Especially if you do most of your hours in the
> c172p...makes for easy checking of those tweaks!  Think someone posted a
> photo from this page to the list once before, but here's an interesting
> review (with a few screen shots) of a photo textured model someone did of
> the c172p for FS2000:
>
> http://www.avsim.com/pages/1000/dreamfleet/df172.shtml
>
> Maybe you should start taking your camera with you?
>
> Best,
>
> Jim
>
>

I love that little "spin recovery" plaque. Brown trousers time.



_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to