On Tuesday 30 April 2002 7:33 pm, Jim Wilson wrote: > David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > There are obviously some aerodynamic changes in the 172R as well as > > the more obvious powerplant and panel changes. Our JSBSim model uses > > mostly the standard 172/182 coefficients that Roskam provides, but > > these are probably wrong for the 172R. > > > > A while ago, Alex suggested that we would be better modelling the > > 172M/N/P (I think), since those are more common. In retrospect, I > > agree, for a slightly different reason -- I don't think that we have > > access to the right numbers for a 172R. > > > > What does everyone else think? Would you all be happy to see the tach > > calibrated to 2700 rather than 2400, and lose 100RPM when you switch > > on carb heat? > > Makes sense to me. Especially if you do most of your hours in the > c172p...makes for easy checking of those tweaks! Think someone posted a > photo from this page to the list once before, but here's an interesting > review (with a few screen shots) of a photo textured model someone did of > the c172p for FS2000: > > http://www.avsim.com/pages/1000/dreamfleet/df172.shtml > > Maybe you should start taking your camera with you? > > Best, > > Jim > >
I love that little "spin recovery" plaque. Brown trousers time. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
