> For what it's worth, I'm involved in a side project that is using > FlightGear + a commercial C172 flight dynamics model + cockpit > hardware to hopefully achieve an FAA (and JAR) certified sim by late > summer / early fall. The commercial fdm will run as a seperate > program [...]
Hmmmmmm, _this_ is what I'm waiting for. Will there be any documentation on how the network protocol will look like ? I'm recognizing that you have checked in several patches to the ExternalNet interface over the time. I would love to profit from this. > Imagine being able to run with the default "stable" JSBSim, or the > previous "stable" version, or the one you are currently hacking on, > just by restarting the desired fdm process. .... maybe with FlightGear getting run from 'inetd', if the FDM sits on a remote machine !? O.k., this might be difficult because of X server write permissions, but I'd like to take care of that if times come, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
