On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:04:51 -0700, Andy Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > ..wee tweak: > > for i in $( seq 100 ) ; do ..should have been "$( seq 0 1 99 )" to be precisely like your i/j job. > > touch $i > > done > > Cute. You learn something new every day. I've never noticed that > utility. I have a vague memory that there is some bash syntax that > does a similar thing, too. And the $(...) syntax was new for me too ..yeah, "for i in ` seq 0 1 99 ` ; do" etc. Cat skin. ;-) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
