David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > A slightly bigger deal would be eliminating the /radios/ property-tree > branch and putting the radios under /instrumentation/, possibly with > some slight restructuring for consistency. That would have the > benefits of simplifying the top level of the property tree, of > consistency to help new users learn the property system, and of making > life easier when I introduce a failure manager in the next couple of > weeks. > > Any comments or suggestions?
Hmmm...simlink property-tree branches? Best, Jim _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
