David Megginson wrote:
Erik Hofman writes:

 > We have three FDM's of which two of them use windtunnel/flight-test
 > data and one is based on physical dimensions of the aircraft. The
 > latter is a bit less accurate but is easier to design a working
 > aircraft for.

To be fair, YASim is not necessarily less accurate, though it does use
a solver to fill in many of the blanks.

In fact, YASim is currently the only FDM that performs calculations
for each lifting surface separately -- YASim figures out the angle of
attack, lift, and drag for each surface then calculates moments from
the differential lift and drag, while JSBSim uses a single angle of
attack for the entire aircraft and simulates the differences in lift
and drag using a long series of moment coefficients.  Both are fine in

Yeah, but the windtunnel or flight-test data woudl include the individual coefficients in one single value. This means that if there is data for -180 ... +180 degree AOA and Yaw JSBSim (and UIUC) woudl be more accurate compared to YASim.


That said, YASim is realy a good alternative for most situations.

Erik


_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to