On Sat, 31 May 2003 22:26:54 -0400, David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Arnt Karlsen writes: > > > ..that's fuel to destination, then on to alternate, and then 30 > > minutes, no? (thought it was 45 min reserve) > > That's only for IFR; for day VFR, we need 30 minutes' reserve, > period (45 minutes at night). > > > ..how much of the haze is window, and camera "tint"? Was this > > haze inversion and smog just moving away from cities, industry > > or large powerplants? > > I'm not sure why the pictures were so washed out, but at Jon's ..I would guess camera are set up for "ground shots", the light is pretty different at altitude, for good air shots, you may wanna set up your camera with less light and richer color and sharper contrast. > suggestion, I ran them through the Gimp and sharpened them up a bit. > The revised versions are now online. ..these are closer to what you remember seeing, right? Still _very_ hazy compared to what I see around here, and the south-west _is_ the dirtiest part of Norway haze-wise, as we get some of the tail pipe poop from the EU, especially from the UK. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
