On Saturday 16 August 2003 15:21, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> Erik Hofman writes:
> > Jim Wilson wrote:
> > 
> > > Someday there'll be a place for FlightGear addons on avsim, etc.
> > 
> > Maybe we can speed it up but renaming it to:
> > 
> > FlightGear Skybound 2005
> 
> How about "FlightGear Ultra-Professional Edition Version 10.0 +++"
> 
> At some point, version numbers went from denoting differences between
> versions of the same product and now they seem to be used more as a
> marketing tool to try to make one product sound more advanced than
> it's competition.  Leave it to marketing to screw up something
> useful. :-)
> 
> Curt.
> -- 
> Curtis Olson   IVLab / HumanFIRST Program       FlightGear Project
> Twin Cities    curt 'at' me.umn.edu             curt 'at' flightgear.org
> Minnesota      http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt   http://www.flightgear.org


Why not keep using the version No. to reflect the versions but give the 
releases names?  I'm thinking of the way that Debian does it.

Any suggestions for a source of names suitable for FG?

;)

LeeE


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to