"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: <snip> > Two areas of concern. There are about 40 variations on the c172 and > about 20 variations on the c310 with different incantations and > aliases and various conglomerations of yasim, jsbsim, 3d cockpits, 2d > cockpits, etc. etc. etc. This was kind of messy since they all tend > to refer back and forth to each other and all over the place. I think > I got everything tweaked correctly, but those of you who care about > these should maybe double check that I didn't screw something up. I'll run through some the next couple of days. This is really a great improvement.
> At some point it might be worth taking a pass through the existing > aircraft and moving those that have significant problems or > significantly missing pieces off to some other area ... > > We might also want to start thinking of an official organization > hierarchy such as: > > Aircraft/ > LightSingles/ > JetFighters/ > CommercialJets/ > CommercialTurboProps/ > Bombers/ > WWI/ > WWII/ > SailPlanes/ > Experimental/ That's good. Maybe a more generic Historical category would be useful? Not all of the planes that fit in WWII would necessarily be just military and I'm not sure the j3cub would necessarily belong in the light singles (even though it would in a sense). Oh yeah and we have light twin piston too. An eye toward organizing for a menu system (interactive aircraft selection) would be good. Not sure what if any issues lay there. Best, Jim _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
