Jon Berndt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

> 
> > That's good.  Maybe a more generic Historical category would be 
> > useful?
> 
> Don't all of our aircraft fit into that category?
> 
> :-)

Well I suppose you could call anything that isn't built any more historical, 
but for the most part the term seems to be used for pre 1950's stuff.  Even
though it hasn't been built for over a quarter century I wouldn't even put the
310 in  that classification.  BTW the 310 isn't a real military aircraft
despite the U-3A 3D model we have.  AFAIK there were only maybe a handful
built for the USAF  to carry higher ups to golf games, courier service, and
what not.  It isn't clear that any were actually built for the navy.  All the
photos available online are for the "blue canoe" airforce model.  The aircraft
that model is based on is a restoration that may have originally been a
civilian plane.

Best,

Jim


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to