As David said, there is very little adverse yaw from aileron input on modern aircraft designs. Now, I have no experience of anything but Cessnas but on an A320 for example, I would be surprised if the aileron input required to perform say, a 20 deg. bank turn would require *any* rudder input at all to maintain balance. It may even be taken care of by the flight computer...
<flameproof jacket on> So maybe the problem could be with the FDM representing the wrong adverse yaw amount for that aircraft? </flameproof jacket on> All the best, Matt. On 14:04 Thu 08 Jan 2004, Hof Markus wrote: > I'm not sure of this, but I think you are right! I'll think about. > I tried on A320 to fly turn at 25?BNK an ball was never centered! even > if BNK did'nt change. > Anyway: > to keep the ball centered, as you said, I'll need a rudder due to adverse > yaw (and maybe some other things :)) ). > I just want to write rudder functions (components in flight modell) to keep > the ball centered. > I think the best way to get an error for trigger functions is to take accel. > of y-axis and keep it to 0. > The trigger holds accel-y-axis to 0, and so the ball should always be > centered? _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
