> David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > It's the location on the plane where the FDM reports the
> > lon/lat/alt.  It's  kind-of a nifty idea, actually.
>
> In relation to?  It is always 0,0,0 in Yasim.
>
> Best,
>
> Jim


JSBSim could also define the tip of the nose as (0,0,0). It really doesn't
matter a whole lot. However, internally, the FDMs really don't care about
exact locations - only relative distances. I think we all agree on that. So,
instead of defining some arbitrary frame, _we_use_an_industry_standard_,
which is the structural frame that the manufacturer defines, when available.
It is always (in my experience) X positive aft, Y positive right, with the
origin being seemingly  arbitrary. For us, that solution works great and is
very appropriate. When the frame is not known, we could just as easily
decide that the origin could be at the nose tip. In any case, given the
potential variances in structural coordinate frames - and especially
considering that there are many FDMs, the 3D model placement code needs to
be able to match up with the FDM. I think our VRP solution works well, and
is versatile given our situation.

Jon


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to