Martin Spott writes: > David Megginson wrote: > > Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/pa28-161/Models > > In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv6690/Aircraft/pa28-161/Models > > > Modified Files: > > pa28-161.ac panel.rgb > > Added Files: > > bench-back.rgb glareshield.rgb > > Log Message: > > Added textures for the back bench (not right yet) and the glareshield. > > This aircraft gets really nice.
I'll second that - it really is good. It looks really good, and at high resolutions the frame rate is much better than the default - I've seen 60 (pa28) vs. 30 (c172) at some locations and resolutions. One bug though - I don't see the instrument needles under Linux with an NVidia card. I thought you simply hadn't done them, until I saw them under Cygwin with an ATI card. I see the large tilting plane in the turn co-ordinator, and the AI, but none of the more 'needlish' needles. I've got no idea what the problem is. It also seems a lot easier to bleed off speed and/or height on approach by throttling back cf. the default Cessna. I would imagine they're both similar in that respect in real life, as a pilot of both can you (David M) give us some idea of which you think is more representative of real world behaviour? Once again, very nice model :-) Cheers - Dave _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
