Not to mention blackout/redout from extreme G's.
-Ethan
>From: David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: FlightGear developers discussions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: FlightGear developers discussions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Visualising forces
>Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:29:42 -0500
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from baron.me.umn.edu ([128.101.142.119]) by mc1-f3.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:30:32 -0800
>Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=baron.me.umn.edu)by baron.me.umn.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))id 1B31XL-0007oq-00; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:30:23 -0600
>Received: from outbound.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.171] ident=mailnull)by baron.me.umn.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))id 1B31Wm-0007oj-00for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:29:48 -0600
>Received: from cpe000c414eb955-cm014490118788.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com([24.43.66.150] helo=attglobal.net)by outbound.mailhop.org with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.20)id 1B31Wk-000AwW-RHfor [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:29:47 -0500
>X-Message-Info: QIy1oIULmHch3Nn8PmebqGz+fqP5Na8O
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;rv:1.6) Gecko/20040312 Debian/1.6-3
>X-Accept-Language: en
>References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS.org
>X-Report-Abuse-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-MHO-User: dmeggin
>X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
>Precedence: list
>List-Id: FlightGear developers discussions
>List-Unsubscribe: ,
>List-Archive:
>List-Post:
>List-Help:
>List-Subscribe: ,
>Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Mar 2004 23:30:34.0779 (UTC) FILETIME=[83C5E6B0:01C40AE5]
>
>Jim Wilson wrote:
>
>>Currently I think we're interested in making the viewer and FDM
>>totally
>>independent of each other, so something else that manipulates the
>>property
>>tree values would be the best way to go. My thought is the viewer
>>is on its
>>way to SimGear soon. Anyway, just wanted to mention this before
>>something
>>was added to make the viewer more FDM dependent. Maybe this is
>>another nasal
>>script candidate?
>
>We had something like that for a while with the 2D panel, but it
>wasn't on by default and I don't think many people used it.
>
>There's no need to add a direct dependency: the forces are all
>published to the property tree, and the viewer could optionally use
>them from there. Personally, I've never experienced more than 2G or
>less than (close to) 0G in flight, and neither forces much head
>movement: you sense it more through your muscle resistence than your
>head actually moving up/down/left/right. Extreme G's, obviously,
>should slam the head around a bit.
>
>
>All the best,
>
>
>David
>
>_______________________________________________
>Flightgear-devel mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
