On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:02:20 -0500, Norman wrote in message 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Jim Wilson writes:
> > 
> > Jon Berndt said:
> > 
> > > > David Megginson wrote:
> > > > > I agree with Curt.  There are two basic strategies for
> > > > > releasing: 2. Release often, testing every release only
> > > > > lightly. I think that #2 works better for most cases
> > > >
> > > > One way of looking at it is this: The goal isn't to produce
> > > > individual releases with the greatest quality, it's to produce
> > > > the best software we can with the resources available.  
> > > 
> > > My current task (daytime) involves leading the development of
> > > prototype space shuttle flight software, which includes testing
> > > the releases and writing the release reports. If I took the above
> > > approach I'd be out of a job in two minutes. Obviously, it's
> > > different for volunteer efforts. I would
> > 
> > That's right, it is different, and I think that should be enough to
> > skip the rest of your argument.  
> 
> There is no reason we can't have our cake and eat it too.
> 
> The way to be able todo this is to use more of CVS features.
> 
> i.e. USE BRANCHES for all commits.

..my understanding of "cvs the FlightGear way" is our early work in cvs
was mistakenly put into the cvs tree the "oposite way of what cvs guys
meant cvs to be", am I way off, or was this mistake corrected?
 
> Believe it or not this, lberally using branches within the CVS, leads
> to less rather then more work as is often percieved.
> 
> http://dev.zope.org/CVS/ZopeCVSFAQ
> 
> > I am no less than amazed that we have any sort of release now.
> 
> Indeed I am always amazed at how any OpenSource project with 
> *multiple* developers manages to get a release out at all :-)
> 
> Norman

..amen, and thank you.  :-)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.



_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to