On Saturday 15 May 2004 16:51, Jim Wilson wrote: > Lee Elliott said: > > On Saturday 15 May 2004 13:11, Jim Wilson wrote: > > > Lee Elliott said: > > > > I just found this collection of 3-views and colour schemes > > > > > > > > http://www.beuliland.com/html/camo/camufla.htm > > > > > > > > Some of them appear to be 'Don Color' drawings but others don't have > > > > any origin. > > > > > > Found the colors (all military) but not the 3-views. Is there another > > > page not at that link? > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Jim > > > > Yeah - it all seems to be military stuff. Sorry, I didn't intend to > > imply that there were separate 3-views - while these images aren't > > terribly big, they do seem pretty clear and are better than many other > > 3-views I've found. > > Oh no, that's not what I meant. I see "colors" for painting but not 3-view > (call them 2-view?). Just thought there was something I was missing. >
Doh! - you're absolutely right:) I should have said 2-views. I never noticed the lack of front/end views. > It is difficult to be fascinated with aircraft and not have an enthusiasm > for military designs. I just noted that about the site because it seems > odd to see a model painting discussion that excludes civilian so > completely. > > Best, > > Jim It's almost like a collector's site in that it's specialised - I'd love to find a civilian version. That's a good point about enthusiasm for military designs. While I abhor war and believe it rarely improves a situation, I do generally find military designs more interesting than civilian stuff. There are civilian designs that I find interesting but their number is dwarfed by the military designs I'm interested in. If I had a todo list of models, I guess about 90-95% of them would be military. LeeE _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
