On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:21:16 +0100, Vivian wrote in message 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> 
> > Sent: 26 October 2004 21:54
> > To: FlightGear developers discussions
> > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Trajectory show when replay?
> > 
> > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:16:11 -0500, David wrote in message
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 
> > > > > It's been a while since I looked at the submodel code so I
> > > > > don't remember if I
> > > > > ever added the "aerostabilize" configuration item.  This
> > > > > allows the submodel
> > > > > to ignore aerostabilization (which is on by default), so it
> > > > > will maintain the
> > > > > initial pitch.
> > > >
> > > > You didn't - all submodels align with the trajectory, and the
> > > > option to turn this off hasn't been implemented. Not difficult:
> > > > do we want it? I could do it this week sometime.
> > >
> > > Yes, I think it's needed for contrails to work properly anyway,
> > > isn't it?
> > 
> > ..that, and downwash.  We do model downwash now?
> > 
> 
> Not in submodels. I don't think I see the relevance for ballistic
> objects.

..only late in the trajectory. ;-)   I was thinking of  downwash (and
wing tip vortices) impact on contrails, smoke, and other aircraft, like
in formation flight.
 
> BTW, I've finished and tested the update to submodels: we can now
> switch off aerodynamic alignment to the trajectory. You need this:
> 
> <aero-stabilised>false</aero-stabilised>
> 
> in your submodels.xml file.

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.



_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Reply via email to