On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 08:32:25 +0200, Boris wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [OT] > > Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:50:01 +0200, Florian wrote in message > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>I dont need a specific bird. The user should be able to steer easily > >>but still using his muscles. It should be sports after all. The > >>simulation is merely a motivation. > > > > > > ..get evil; model say a Gossamer Condor or whatever these pedal > > powered Channel crossing planes were called, _truthfully_, including > > the pedal power to power the sim computer at 300 - 450W or whatever > > it was. ;-) > > that sounds certainly like a lot of fun - I remember an expo some time > ago where you were allowed to (try to) power a bulb, fan, radio or > even TV by using merely pedal power ... > > Nobody managed to get the TV working, though :-) > > > >>>YES, it would propably be very interesting to meet a confused > >pigeon>>at FL350 :-) > >> > >>lol. :) > >>I consider the confused pigeon to be the logo for the software.. ;) > > > > > > ..make it sweaty. ;-) > > ...at that altitude that sounds a bit nasty, or does it have > anti-icing equipment onboard ? ;-) ..hummmm, flapping wings? ;-) > ...of course Erik's penguin could possibly be able to deal with the > icing part, on the other hand how do get it up to FL350 - probably > only by dropping it from something like FL1000 ? :-) ..naaah, flap a bit harder. ;-) > At least we wouldn't have to care for the (lack of) lift anymore, I > think a penguin's body would probably make for a good illustration of > the lifted wing body concept ;-) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d