On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 17:42:37 +0100, Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Curtis L. Olson -- Monday 08 November 2004 16:22: > > To be fair, X-Plane does some things that are a lot nicer than FG. > > Also, our Mac support is woefully inadequate (mostly because we have > > precious few Mac developers on board.) The original poster was > > referencing the Mac platform and I think his comments were entirely fair. > > Ah, OK. Didn't relate this to the Mac port. At first this looked like > the classical troll post: go to an application specific forum, tell > how this app sucks and how others are better (which so far would be > OK) but then do not describe what exactly are the reasons for this > conclusion. Yes, fgfs' Mac incarnation may be less than optimal, but > that's only because the Apple users don't care much for FlightGear. :-) > > m. > Just to make myself more clear. I like FlightGear. It's a great simulator. I just like X-Plane better because it's of better quality and a more mature product. Especially on OSX :) The fact that I can't build the latest source without problems I don't know how to fix just adds to the reasons but is not the reason.
Once I get everything building I will make my builds available online for OSX. -- <Arthur/> _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
