On December 29, 2004 04:07 pm, Martin Spott wrote: > "Curtis L. Olson" wrote: > > [...] Also we need to figure out how to interpolate different cloud > > layers and coverages. > > That's exactly the problem I was pointing at. I have started digging > through my meteo textbook and it appears to me that presumably more > different phenomenons that might follow each other in METAR reports > where we might face the problem of not having an unambiguous > transitional stage - although maybe they are currently not utilized > within FlightGear (there's currently no rain in FG, is it ?), > > Martin.
We should also look into changing the lighting condition according to different types of weather. Perhaps we can check the position of the active camera, and then do the followings: - Make ambient intensity proportional to the density of clouds. - Make diffuse intensity inversely proportional to the density of clouds. - Make light intensity inversely proportional to the density of clouds. Ampere _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
