Le jeudi 26 mai 2005 à 09:35 +0100, Richard Bytheway a écrit : > > -----Original Message----- > > Erik Hofman > > Norman Vine wrote: > > > > > > > http://baron.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2003-Se > ptember/021434.html > > > > I don't see the XML files as being any different then any other source file > > and > > source code needs to be compiled. > > > >I've had this in the back of my mind ever since you brought it up, but > >not many people (including XML experts) seem to like binary XML. I'm > >still undecided about it. > > > >Erik > > Would it be possible to have a compiled form stroed on disk, which is > automatically regenerated on startup of FGFS based on rules similar to make. > If the ASCII version is newer than the compiled version, rebuild the compiled > version. > This could be transparent to the user (they simply edit the ASCII version), > it simply causes the startup time to be longer the next time around, but if > no changes are made then there is no time penalty. > > Richard > This goes to an answer and an advantage for the PLAYERS. Which is not in my sense the fundamental idea we have of FGFS. I am a LINUX user i like the open access to everything. Ten years ago when i ought to use and work on windows i did not like that closed system, and was happy when LINUX went up. May be, presents windows users don't know that existing advantage. Don't go back to the "DARK SIDE". Any way if a day that "functionality" is implemented, it must be an option. -- Gerard
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
