> directly. We aren't trying to eventually replace JSBsim with a
> proprietary flight dynamics model here so please, I don't want anyone to
> worry. :-) <cough>Jon</cough> :-) My main goal for attending this show
> was to show the flexibility and adaptability of FlightGear as an
> engineering and rapid prototyping tool. I think FlightGear will have a
> big future in that area.
At $1900 for a commercial license for Matlab (only Matlab - not simulink) it's
that some are bypassing Matlab. It's obviously a great tool with a
history, but there are some alternatives in the Open Source world
Also, I'm working on JSBSim Commander, which will make using JSBSim with flight
development a little more fun, if not useful and practical for broader uses.
I think it's great that FlightGear is getting so much attention from commercial
partnerships. It helps/benefits us all. JSBSim has lately been adding 2 or 3
week to the mailing list, so that's encouraging. The newsletter also publishes
the new and
innovative ways that JSBSim is being used in industry.
There's a place for everyone ...
Flightgear-devel mailing list